11/8/09 10:47 pm - ![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
_asta_
Боже, кэнон хочет 100 евро за простой кабель.
andysim - RIP Виталий Лазаревич Гинзбург
crankypafnootty posting in ![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/community.gif){kind=small}
ru_f1
ssart - Российское ценообразование...ssart - Паста с курицей-карриmagadani posting in download_cd - The Complete Studio Recordings
belyh - Историяviksss posting in download_cd - Dan Cantrellpodmoskovnik - Анализ выборов 1996 и 2000 г. - ссылкаerisena_tenecka posting in ru_london - Laibach_ziggurat_ posting in ru_cats - Отдается рыжий кот, г. Рязань
capi4ca posting in ru_cats - Телевизор
warsh - Два бойца
r_w posting in ru_cats - Рыжие котята
andysim - Math in the USSR...
Moscow
![[ equation ]](http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-EV532_equati_F_20091106211112.jpg)
It may be no accident that, while some of the best American mathematical minds worked to solve one of the century's hardest problems—the Poincaré Conjecture—it was a Russian mathematician working in Russia who, early in this decade, finally triumphed.
Decades before, in the Soviet Union, math placed a premium on logic and consistency in a culture that thrived on rhetoric and fear; it required highly specialized knowledge to understand; and, worst of all, mathematics lay claim to singular and knowable truths—when the regime had staked its own legitimacy on its own singular truth. All this made mathematicians suspect. Still, math escaped the purges, show trials and rule by decree that decimated other Soviet sciences.
Three factors saved math. First, Russian math happened to be uncommonly strong right when it might have suffered the most, in the 1930s. Second, math proved too obscure for the sort of meddling Joseph Stalin most liked to exercise: It was simply too difficult to ignite a passionate debate about something as inaccessible as the objective nature of natural numbers (although just such a campaign was attempted). And third, at a critical moment math proved immensely useful to the state.
T
( Read more... )</div>
</div> iStockphoto</div></div></div>Following the war, the Soviets invested heavily in high-tech military research, building over 40 cities where scientists and mathematicians worked in secret. The urgency of the mobilization recalled the Manhattan Project—only much bigger and lasting much longer. Estimates of the number of people engaged in the Soviet arms effort in the second half of the century range up to 12 million people, with a couple million of them employed by military-research institutions.
These jobs spelled nearly total scientific isolation: For defense employees, any contact with foreigners would be considered treasonous rather than simply suspect. In addition, research towns provided comfortably cloistered social environments but no possibility for outside intellectual contact. The Soviet Union managed to hide some of its best mathematical minds away in plain sight.
In the years following Stalin's death in 1953, the Iron Curtain began to open a tiny crack—not quite enough to facilitate much-needed conversation with non-Soviet mathematicians but enough to show off some of Soviet mathematics' proudest achievements.
By the 1970s, a Soviet math establishment had taken shape. A totalitarian system within a totalitarian system, it provided its members not only with work and money but also with apartments, food, and transportation. It determined where they lived and when, where, and how they traveled for work or pleasure. To those in the fold, it was a controlling and strict but caring mother: Her children were undeniably privileged.
Even for members of the math establishment, though, there were always too few good apartments, too many people wanting to travel to a conference. So it was a vicious, back-stabbing little world, shaped by intrigue, denunciations and unfair competition.
Then there were those who could never join the establishment: those who happened to be born Jewish or female, those who had had the wrong advisers at university or those who could not force themselves to join the Party. For these people, "the most they could hope for was being able to defend their doctoral dissertation at some institute in Minsk, if they could secure connections there," says Sergei Gelfand, publisher of the American Mathematical Society—who also happens to be the son of one of Russia's top 20th-century mathematicians, Israel Gelfand, a student of Mr. Kolmogorov. Some Western mathematicians, Sergei Gelfand adds, "even came for an extended stay because they realized there were a lot of talented people. This was unofficial mathematics."
Besides Grigory Perelman and the Poincaré Conjecture, there are numerous other famous math solvers, and there are still problems to solve.
Andrew Wiles (1953-)
This Princeton mathematician resolved the most famous problem in numbers—Fermat's Last Theorem—in 1995.
Leonhard Euler (1707–1783)
A Swiss mathematician who made so many contributions, particularly in the early foundations of calculus, that it gets hard to keep track of all that's named for him.
Kurt Gödel (1906–1978)
This Austrian logician demonstrated that any reasonably powerful system of math contains true statements that can't be proven.
The Riemann Hypothesis
To the enduring befuddlement of mathematicians, prime numbers—numbers divisible only by themselves and 1—exhibit no pattern at all: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13 are the first few. They aren't evenly spaced but get scarcer the further out you go. No formula can tell you what the next one will be. In 1859, the German mathematician Bernhard Riemann discovered that a function—known now as the Riemann zeta function (expressed in the graphic above)—appeared to give signposts to where primes lie in the great field of numbers. It provided some order to the mystery. Riemann conjectured that these key signposts—"zeros" of the function—all lie on a single straight line out to infinity, that none are flung off in strange places. In the 150 years since, no one has proved his hypothesis. To a mathematician, the hypothesis looks like this: All non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function have a real part equal to ½.
--Charles Forelle
One such visitor was Dusa McDuff, then a British algebraist and now a professor emerita at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. She studied with the older Mr. Gelfand for six months, and credits this experience to opening her eyes both to what mathematics really is: "It was a wonderful education... Gelfand amazed me by talking of mathematics as though it were poetry."
</div>
In the mathematical counterculture, math "was almost a hobby," recalls Sergei Gelfand. "So you could spend your time doing things that would not be useful to anyone for the nearest decade." Mathematicians called it "math for math's sake." There was no material reward in this—no tenure, no money, no apartments, no foreign travel; all they stood to gain was the respect of their peers.
Math not only held out the promise of intellectual work without state interference (if also without its support) but also something found nowhere else in late-Soviet society: a knowable singular truth. "If I had been free to choose any profession, I would have become a literary critic," says Georgii Shabat, a well-known Moscow mathematician. "But I wanted to work, not spend my life fighting the censors." The search for that truth could take long years—but in the late Soviet Union, time seemed to stand still.
( Read more... )
bitchyssart - Типа-лоранский пирогvbhtr и alexeynagaev. Собственно, рецепты в массе своей не мои, но проверено лично. 8))fatessa posting in ru_kittens - Буня и Кофа
